CO129-340 - Governor Nathan Acting Governor May - 1907 [4-6] — Page 137

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

133

Firstly, I submit that as the regulations with reference to these appointments being Cadet appointments came into force long after I entered the Registry; which I did in September 1897, Such regulations could not affect me as I consider such regulations could only point to the future and not to the past. I had in fact already acquired a vested interest.

Secondly, I submit that when Mr. Kemp was appointed Deputy Registrar and Appraiser in 1904 he had then his preferential claim satisfied, insomuch as he was appointed in preference to Mr. Melbourne, barrister-at-law and a recent addition to the service. In fact Mr. Kemp was already the senior to Mr. Melbourne, having entered the service in November 1898 while Mr. Melbourne only entered the service in May 1900.

Thirdly, I submit that when Mr. Kemp was appointed Deputy Registrar and Appraiser he entered the ranks of professional men, and that he fully realized this position by going Home almost immediately to read for the Bar, to which he is not yet called: that at present he is only a law student, and that it would be unreasonable and unjust to appoint an unqualified man over a more experienced and qualified one in a legal appointment.

Fourthly, I submit that when I entered the service 22 years ago there were very few Cadets in this Colony and up to the present moment the appointment of Registrar has always been held by an old servant of the Government, that therefore the augmentation of the Cadet service was not to upset the existing system but gradually to fill up the gap and caused by retirement or death of the older servants, that the older servants still remaining have the preference to be filled by a barrister-at-law of experience that their qualifications most faithful service entitles them to.

Fifthly, I submit that the appointment of Registrar should be the invariable rience,

Edit History

2026-06-04 06:47:07 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
133 Firstly, I submit that as the regulations with reference to these appointments being Cadet appointments came into force long after I entered the Registry; which I did in September 1897, Such regulations could not affect me as I consider such regulations could only point to the future and not to the past. I had in fact already acquired a vested interest. Secondly, I submit that when Mr. Kemp was appointed Deputy Registrar and Appraiser in 1904 he had then his preferential claim satisfied, insomuch as he was appointed in preference to Mr. Melbourne, barrister-at-law and a recent addition to the service. In fact Mr. Kemp was already the senior to Mr. Melbourne, having entered the service in November 1898 while Mr. Melbourne only entered the service in May 1900. Thirdly, I submit that when Mr. Kemp was appointed Deputy Registrar and Appraiser he entered the ranks of professional men, and that he fully realized this position by going Home almost immediately to read for the Bar, to which he is not yet called: that at present he is only a law student, and that it would be unreasonable and unjust to appoint an unqualified man over a more experienced and qualified one in a legal appointment. Fourthly, I submit that when I entered the service 22 years ago there were very few Cadets in this Colony and up to the present moment the appointment of Registrar has always been held by an old servant of the Government, that therefore the augmentation of the Cadet service was not to upset the existing system but gradually to fill up the gap and caused by retirement or death of the older servants, that the older servants still remaining have the preference to be filled by a barrister-at-law of experience that their qualifications most faithful service entitles them to. Fifthly, I submit that the appointment of Registrar should be the invariable rience,
Baseline (Original)
133 Firstly, I submit that as the regulations with reference to these appointments being Cadet appointments came into force long after I entered the Registry; which I did in Septem- ber 1897, Such regulations could not affect me as I con- sider such regulations could only point to the future and not to the past. I had in fact already acquired a vested interest. Secondly, I submit that when Mr. Kemp was appointed Deputy Regis- trar and Appraiser in 1904 he had then his preferential claim satisfied, insomuch as he was appointed in prefer- ence to Mr. Melbourne, barrister-at-law and a recent addition to the service. In fact Mr. Kemp was already the senior to Mr. Melbourne, having entered the service in November 1898 while Mr. Melbourne only entered the service in May 1900. Thirdly, I submit that when Mr. Kemp was appointed Deputy Regis- trar and Appraiser he entered the ranks of professional men, and that he fully realized this position by going Home almost immediately to read for the Bar, to which he is not yet called: that at present he is only a law stuğ- dent, and that it would be unreasonable and unjust to ap- point an unqualified man over a more experienced and qualified one in a legal appointment. Fourthly, I submit that when I entered the service 22 years ago there were very few Cadets in this Colony and up to the present moment the appointment of Registrar has always been held by an old servant of the Government, that there- fore the augmentation of the Cadet service was not to up- set the existing system but gradually to fill up the gape and caused by retirement or death of the older servants, that the older servants still remaining have the prefer- Vande ترم بید filled by a barrister-at-law of experi ence that their qualifications most faithful service enti entitles them to. Fifthly, I submit that the appointment of Registrar should be the invariable rience, (ھ) ان
2026-06-04 06:47:07 · Baseline
View content

133

Firstly, I submit that as the regulations with reference to these

appointments being Cadet appointments came into force long after I entered the Registry; which I did in Septem- ber 1897, Such regulations could not affect me as I con- sider such regulations could only point to the future and

not to the past. I had in fact already acquired a vested

interest.

Secondly, I submit that when Mr. Kemp was appointed Deputy Regis-

trar and Appraiser in 1904 he had then his preferential

claim satisfied, insomuch as he was appointed in prefer-

ence to Mr. Melbourne, barrister-at-law and a recent

addition to the service. In fact Mr. Kemp was already the

senior to Mr. Melbourne, having entered the service in

November 1898 while Mr. Melbourne only entered the service

in May 1900.

Thirdly, I submit that when Mr. Kemp was appointed Deputy Regis-

trar and Appraiser he entered the ranks of professional

men,

and that he fully realized this position by going

Home almost immediately to read for the Bar, to which he

is not yet called: that at present he is only a law stuğ-

dent, and that it would be unreasonable and unjust to ap-

point an unqualified man over a more experienced and

qualified one in a legal appointment.

Fourthly, I submit that when I entered the service 22 years ago

there were very few Cadets in this Colony and up to the

present moment the appointment of Registrar has always been held by an old servant of the Government, that there- fore the augmentation of the Cadet service was not to up- set the existing system but gradually to fill up the gape

and caused by retirement or death of the older servants,

that the older servants still remaining have the prefer-

Vande

ترم بید

filled by a barrister-at-law of experi

ence that their qualifications most faithful service enti

entitles them to. Fifthly, I submit that the appointment of Registrar should be

the invariable rience,

(ھ)

ان

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.